Questions Fly reguarding the Berg Beheading

International Answer is a radical anti-war/anti-Bush Socialist activist group (note the strong affection for^ Kerry and Democrats).
Now, Michael Berg ,(Nick Berg's father) is a member of this group. They are the one's planning the Massive march on the pentagon on June 5th.Mr. Berg has been on TV lately blaming Bush for his son's murder.He is WAY out there. First of all, no matter how radical I am, 3 days after my son's gruesome death I don't think I'd be on TV bashing America and reminding everyone to join the march on June 5th.I don't suggest that he isn't grieving. I just think there is something fishy.
Now the consensus is that Nick was Pro-war and Pro-Bush. The media isn't reporting that Berg was in Iraq reportedly to see an Uncle who was not to comfortable with his being there, you know being that he was an American/Jew in a radical Muslim area.Being seen with him made his uncle afraid of the heavy Al-Qaeda presence.He was there to help set up an internet service with his own password to be used by his uncle(an Iraqi).
Nick was an electronics wiz. He built cell phone towers in Iraq.Conversely there is another aspect of Nicks life that squashes this, the latest by his father..........
Berg's father went on TV today saying that Bush and the FBI caused his son's death by holding him for 13 days and making him miss his flight. " They had no right to hold him....Why did they hold him,they won't say"
Here comes the squash....and the questions.
This is what the FBI and Arab police saw in Nick that led to his being detained.
Nick Berg was in Oklahoma,going to college, and he told the FBI that while on a bus a man asks to use his laptop to send some E-mails. The man then used Nick's company password to send data and messages to ......
Zacarias Moussaoui
Moussaoui then gets caught and on his laptop they find E-mail sent by him using Berg's password.
The FBI released Berg with nothing concrete to keep him.
So then Berg goes alone to Iraq. He's stopped and Questioned. They find out that his dad, has sent anti Jewish/Anti American rhetoric and petitions blogged through FreeRepublic.com , to people in Iraq,using the same shared E-Mail account as Nick uses in Iraq,Listed (business account). For Tower Building?
When they looked at his passport they had more questions. It seems that Nick had been to Israel,and to Jordan,many African provinces,and then to Iraq. Many of the places he went to after Israel,do not allow entry if you have a stamp from Israel on it . (no Jewish passage allowed)
Then there was the fact that a non-Arabic speaking Berg had Antisemetic propaganda and a copy of the Quran , in Arabic in his car..?
Now I am not suggesting anything,but this all has a tainted smell to it.
Michael Berg is saying that the FBI had nothing to hold Nick for. Hmmmm, if you were the FBI,post 9-11,post 911 Commission hearings,and you have in Iraq, a man you know as I have described. Would you keep him 10 days(not 13 as Mr.Berg says) just to investigate further? Besides, The American's told him to get home because he was not safe.They offered him a ride and he refused. His dad says because he had been through enough with the FBI and did not trust them. Wow....really, I think that's an understatement.
I am not a Black helicopter theory,conspiracy nut. I do how ever question some of this and wonder what we may uncover next in this scenario. Some people called me a Consp. nut when I suggested that there were Al-Qaeda operatives in Iraq. That would blow the whole "war for oil" "war for revenge" mantra to pieces. "No Terrorist/Saddam connection" the left says. Well, Since it was Abu Musab al Zarqawi, I wonder how they'll wiggle out of this one. It is time that Democrats realize that the radical left is leading the party astray by these Anti-Bush/Anti-American nonsense talking points.
America is at war for the right reasons.We were attacked by Terrorists on 9-11.These terrorists had ties in Iraq. The Oil for food program that was raped by Kofi-Annan , Jacques Chirac ,Gerhard Schroeder, Ambassador Gunter Pleuger of Germany, and others in charge helped Saddam ,Saudi Arabia helped Saddam and Saddam helped Al-Qaeda. That is my instinctual conclusion. The left says it's an illegal war. Have they forgotten that Clinton had the Sudanese government offer Bin Ladden to him but because he did not feel the bombing of the Khobar towers,the '93 World trade center bombing, embassy's bombing in Kenya and Tanzania ,and the attack on the USS Cole were not enough (legally) to hold him. So the Sudan released him in to Afghanistan. We all know what happened next. You can not rationally expect terrorism to be squelched by Policing and legal justification. All that got us over the last 15 years is 17 UN resolutions and time for Saddam to hide his weapons and send more $ to fund terror. We must hunt these monsters down not give empty ultimatums. When Iraq is stable in the coming years,we will see a major change in the region and we will see terror lose it's supporters. Let friends know(especially those unable to turn off CNN) that we are on the right track. Do your best to be sure that in Nov. we vote for an American pres. not for someone who is apt to delegate our national security to the crooked and irrelevant UN and the likes of the World Court at the Hague, that Clinton signed a deal with at the end of his term.
WE can best determine the way best to defend America,We can't afford someone who panders,not now when we know what we know how vulnerable we can be.