Bush was right about WMD's
When Bin Ladden and his counterparts hit us on 911, they awoke many of us to multiple realities. More than the NY sky line changed.Americans realized that we are the target of many people's hate, around the world.
We realize that we cannot take the path of least resistance. We must root out terror. When George Bush took after the Taliban,Alqueda,Hamas,Islamic Jihad,Hezbollah, and many more
Iraq
We know why Saddam wanted to defeat America,but many don't realize how he was already going about it.Saddam was using the Oil for Food Program to launder billions of dollars. He was then using that money to fund these same organizations that have attacked us in the past and are planning to hit us in the next 4 months. Bush did not enter the war to avenge his father, complete an Oil pipeline,steal oil,or any of the other stupid, purely political fiction conjured up by the left.
By removing Saddam, we install democracy in the center(Geographically and Operationally) of the "Axis of Evil".We are creating a resistance in the region that will soon stand alone to achieve the same objectives we have.Strategically we are pinning them. They know it, and they are squirming vigorously.
When the news and media present you with all this double talk about pre-war Intel, and "Did Saddam have WMD" etc, Just remember that in 1991,days after our pull out, The Kurds,a nation of 25 million+,were slaughtered in northern Iraq to the tune of 5 thousand+ in one single day.How were they killed? Mustard and serin Gas (WMD-right? I mean is 5K considered a Mass "? I think so.) I have only one question for those who doubt the reasons for going to war with Iraq: If Saddam can get enough gas to kill 5K in a single day,if he was able to kill more than 100 thousand Kurds
Once more, there are reports now that the famous "State of the Union"
What we are doing in Iraq is right. What we have accomplished in our economy is astounding. The rate of growth in 2004 (GDP),rivals any other year in the last 20! I am sick of hearing the trash that floats around and is regarded as news.Election years are usually pretty intense, but I can't recall, in our country's history,a time when the likes of Moore,Hollywood,the Main stream media and every politically motivated liberal,has been given a free pass and allowed to lie and distort the truth to unseat a Morally just, War time President. It's absurd.
This kind of demagoguery and blatant Judas-ism doesn't stop in the private sector. The Memo
To do this in a time of war, and at a time when so much is at stake is, in my estimation,treasonous at best.
Lets keep our minds focused on the true reason for our Fight......and may we not falter or sway, but remain steadfast in this pivotal time.
Let us never forget.....Lest we fall victim again!
2 Comments:
Ken, you asked/stated;
"I have only one question for those who doubt the reasons for going to war with Iraq: If Saddam can get enough gas to kill 5K in a single day,if he was able to kill more than 100 thousand Kurds in 8 years,if he was making so much money through the Oil for Food fiasco that he was compelled to refuse UN inspectors, and turn his back on sanctioned income totaling more than 100 Billion dollars. If he turned his back on that much income, it must have been worth it! It was, he was useing that money to fund Terror against Israel, and lineing his pockets.Why else would he do that if he had no WMDs to hide."
First of all, America gave him those arms, via Donald Rumsfeld in the 80's.
Second - after Bush 1 pulled out of Iraq in 91, he asked the Iraqi's to overthrow Saddam, and also told the Iraqis that if they did that, then American military forces would be there to help them. So the Iraqis did exactly that, and we left them there to die under the hands of Saddam. Bush 1 went back on his promise stating that going after Saddam in 91 would be "disasterous".
So why didn't we find WMD's when we went in for the second time? Huh?
Why didn't the administration capitalize on your theory if it's so true? And why, when we in fact DID NOT FIND ANY EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER of WMD's in '03, did the administrations focus rapidly shift from WMD's to "liberating" Iraq, consequently turning it into a fundamentalist Islamic Republic? Huh?
By the way, the word "using" is not spelled with an e.
Thank you Sir David for stooping to correct my spelling. I am truely honored to have a man of your stature deign to help out a sad peasant like me. I should have known better. I am so ashamed. Once again David, thanks, if you would like to continue to perus my site and seek out misspellings for me I would be blessed beyond compare......
as for the rest of your comment.....I have explained this until I am blue in the face! The post you commented on answers every point you made. As for the WMDs. Well, this post is old and I really should do one with up to date data. In the mean time....read this:
World Net Daily Feb. 28, 2006 See ya around
Post a Comment
<< Home