MEN IN BLACK

It is written by arguably one of the greatest constitutional minds, ever. It is "Men in Black" by Mark "F Lee" Levin.
He speaks plainly, as he told Rush today, this book is for the common everyday person to read and understand.
You see, our greatest chance to insure that Christian moral values are kept secure in our country is to see to it that we protect the 'Framing documents' ie the Constitution.
I have stated many times that there is no mention of the "Separation of Church and State' in the constitution. But Mark helps to remind us that it isn't the Constitution that they are sighting," It comes from Hugo Black , in 1947 and the Everson decision . Hugo Black was a Supreme Court Justice appointed by FDR. Before that, he was for a couple years an active member of the Klan. Black snuck this language into the decision: wall of separation, strict wall of separation. That's nowhere in the Constitution. Black put it in this decision. So now when all these pseudo-civil libertarians are running around saying, you know, "separation of church and state," I think we should remind them: You're not quoting Jefferson; you're quoting Hugo Black, the former Klansman! "
The problem is that the Supreme Court has too much power. With no term limits, we allow for a group of people to sit as absolute rulers over us. We get people like William O. Douglas And James McReynolds a segregationist. These people have positioned themselves as interpreters of the Constitution. It is the belief of many Leftists that the Constitution is a ' Living ' Document. By this logic, they claim that Roe V Wade is Constitutional, they try to strike down the Pledge of Allegiance, any thing that they want, Gay marriage for instance, is obtainable as long as there are a majority of liberal judges in the Supreme Court and radical 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. If it is a case that needs to be substantiated, they simply read into the constitution what ever they think the framers meant to say. It is absurd.
We need to do a Reformation on the Supreme Court. It is slowly in the works. It appears that the Senate can call for a vote to change the rule that allows for filibustering a Supreme court nominee. It requires 51 votes, The Republicans have 51+ votes at the ready. Do not let liberals tell you that it requires a Super Majority ( 60 Votes). There are seven instances that require a Super Majority, and Advice and Consent is not on that list. I believe they are waiting for the prodding of their Constituency. That means WE must write to our representatives and demand that George Bush be given the right to leave his own stamp on the American Supreme court. Without the control of the Supreme Court, the Liberals will not have any ability to effect change in the Constitution and will be unable to attack Christian values! Bush should have the chance to appoint as many as 3 new Court Justices to the bench. You KNOW what kind of person he will appoint.
The problem is the Liberal Democrats want to filibuster ( Delay until it is withdrawn) any Appointee that they feel is too Conservative. They mean to say " Too Christian".The Democrats change the constitution every time a liberal judge dictates from the bench, and manipulates it to support his agenda or ignores it altogether. We are not proposing to change a " Framing Document" we are changing a Senate rule. Not by slithering through and under the Constitution, but by following Senate Ordinances.
I pray that many will read this and pass it along. I hope you will buy or check out a copy of Mark Levin's "Men in black" and share it and your new found wisdom with others.
We must put pressure on our Senators and representatives to bring this to a vote and lets be done with it!