The Squamata Report: Illegal Immigration

Monday, April 10, 2006

Illegal Immigration




























Farcical Politics
Bush is against illegal immigration. McCain and Kennedy are against it too. The House and Senate are overwhelmingly against it. So, concerned Americans like myself should be assured that everything is going to work out fine. Right!?..... Wrong!
In 1986, Congress passed legislation, similar to the bills 'in progress' today, requiring illegal Aliens to pay a fine, learn English and work in America for a certain length of time. It was a failure in 1986 it was a failure in 1965 and it will be just as unsuccessful today. Anyone who looks at the southern border problem (devoid of a political agenda) knows that any proposal that does not call for the erection of a high tech fence or fortified wall is incompetent and destined for failure. So far, partisan politics have been the driving force behind every proposal to date. The only assurance is that when the smoke clears, nothing of lasting value will be accomplished.

Last week Bush went south to meet with Latin American leaders to explain that they are all going to have to get on board with America in solving the issue once and for all. Unilaterally these people have decided on the answer. What is it? Well, simply calling illegal aliens, undocumented workers is not gonna cut it. We need to refer to them as migrant workers and for the most part just refer to them as immigrants. I mean, who could be against immigrants? Next, make everyone who is here illegally tattle on themselves and then let them stay. That is brilliant! With this plan there are immediate results. Presto, no more illegal aliens. No more problem.Maybe it is just me, but I don't think these government leaders, ours included, have America's best interest at heart.


The 1965 plan to reform immigration laws was written by the same half-wit who is writing the foremost bill today. Ted Kennedy presented a failure of a bill that gave public assistance to illegal immigrants. Now today he wants to present a bill to ' fix ' what he helped break! How? By doing the same thing as before! Is'nt there some saying...Oh yeah..."Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."

In the past two weeks Congressional bills and proposals have out numbered their supporters. Before the last Senate proposal faded away, it seemed the lone voices of reason were Senators Cornyn and Kyl who saught renewed interest in a proposal of their own, called
'The Comprehensive Enforcement and Immigration Reform Act of 2005 S.1438'.
It calls for no amnesty and tougher enforcement. Of Kennedy and McCain's Bill, Sen. Cornyn said, "It will encourage further disrespect for our laws and will undercut our efforts to shore up homeland security," Cornyn is also for building a fence. However he is being drowned out by those who say a wall is impossible to build, and besides, it would not accomplish what it is intended to. Hmm. Walls are not possible to build and they don't accomplish their objective. Is that true?
A Concrete Curtain














Fittingly we are approaching the 50th anniversary of the Marshall Plan that resulted in aid to West Germany. It was this financial aid, that made it popular for those who were oppressed by the Communist system in East Germany to do what ever it took to cross over into West Berlin. In 1952 the Zonengrenze (open border between east and west Germany) was closed. After 3,000,000 of the seventeen million East Germans had made the pilgrimage, it was evident that the East could not survive if the economic bloodletting did not stop. So on August 13, 1961 they erected a 28 mile wall (later to be added on to twice more). The eventual 61 miles of 11ft tall concrete wall was guarded by 302 watch towers and twenty bunkers. Until it's fall in 1989 the wall only allowed as few as 5,000 illegal immigrants. A stark contrast to the three million over a period of less than a decade.



The Great Wall of China



More than two thousand years ago the Chinese finished a 4,000 mile wall. They needed the wall to protect themselves from hoards of Mongols and nomadic tribes set on the destruction and ultimate rule of China. Along the wall there are thousands of barracks, towers, administrative buildings etc. The wall was successful in protecting China for centuries. (since the Quin Dynasty of 3rd century BC) It is one of The 7 greatest wonders of the world and it's vicissitude is the stuff of legend. Although primitive abilities built and then joined the sections into one continuous wall in China, still we get reports on how there is just no way a wall could be built by Americans today. This kind of disreguard for the truth is anti-patriotism and it is the stuff that brings down nations.


Our own Wall
In accepting the proof outlined in history reguarding the success of constructing a wall, one must accept that our building of a wall, here and now, cloaked in the technological advancement of 21st century America, could not possibly fail in achieving it's objective. So why the debate? If building a wall and removing the illegal imigrant's social welfare and protection of 'OUR' Constitution is all it would take to make us secure and bolster our economy, why is their so much debate?
The only reason to argue against the simple protection of our country against outside intruders is that you have a political agenda or you are one of the fanatical followers of José Vasconcelo's 'La Raza' . These people are freaks who want to take over America and at least bring the southwest under Mexican rule. It's lunitics like these that pull the strings in the illegal imigrant protest rallies. It is the Aztlan followers that America need watch closly. They are bennefitting their cause by financing and managing many of these rallies. Today on Daryl Ankarlo's show, some wack job called pretending to be of this mind set that America belongs to Mexico, he kept saying that they are going to burn America, our cities would burn and white anglos like Ankarlo and the guest were going to be the first ones crushed. I realise he was likely a wack job who wants to start trouble, but aware of it or not, he is feeding the fire of racial hatred and conquest against the USA. The rallies are doing the same. Presidents and Congressmen who pussy-foot around, contorting and placateing to win political favor, had better wake up and protect this nation or we will see an end to America and it's ultimately superior system of governance. But most importantly, we will see an end to freedom around the world!


La Reconquista

I am disappointed in these confused kids who skipped school to join in pro-Aztlan rallies( ' imigration support protests' if you're PC ). Many had no idea they were supporting a movement started by a mad man 44 years ago. Let me just tell you a little about this movement.

In August of 1962 a man named Reies López Tijerina wrote a letter to a group of Pueblos and Pobladores who believe the American Southwest belongs to Mexico. In this letter he drafted the outlines for an alliance between the two cultures. This alliance became known as 'La Alianza'.

Mr. Tijerina is a Marxist-Terrorist who brought together an eventual group of 20,000 people, moved them into the desert just outside of Tierra Amarilla, New Mexico and claimed the land. They say their ancestors were the original owners of the land and furthermore, all of the southwest was their land. They were the rightful owners, not America. Some of the youth from the settlement drifted into town to burglarize and vandalize.
Soon a group of them were arrested. So Tijerina went to Tierra Amarilla. He and a group of men raided the courthouse and shot two officers while escaping with the prisoners. Soon Tijerina and others went to jail for their involvment. How long? The usual sentence for running a Marxist, racist commune who feeds off the city and shoots two police officers....thirty five days.

Earlier in 1966 Tijerina and three hundred of his men actually invaded and occupied by force the Echo Amphitheater Park and renamed it 'Republic of San Joaquín del Río de Chama'. They set up their own government and even arrested forest rangers and held trials. Only five men were arrested, Tijerina among them, and released on bail.



Later, groups like
MEChA (Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlán) or Chicano Student Movement of Aztlán took up Tijerian's cause. Charles Truxillo and the followers of 'AZTLAN' have instigated and
facilitated many of the protests in the past weeks.Couple these wack jobs with 'La Raza' and what you have is a massive coalition of hatred toward Americans. Organizing school walkouts and carring signs that call for the overthrow of America and the taking back of the land.This group and others like them believe that Israel is a terrorist nation. They point to what they call is a Muslim
hollocaust perpetrated by the Jews in Israel. They support Hamas and their overthrow of Israel.This movement is nicknamed 'la reconquista", and if we do not take them seriously, they may be successful.





Multi-Culturalism
Many would say that America has no culture of it's own, but rather it is made up of many separate cultures who co-exist. This line of thinking is not only false it is misleading. The enemies of America wish they could divide us in such a way. If they are successful in their bid to institute multi Culturalism in America, they know we will crumble from within. Instead, America does have it's own distinct culture. We are a diverse people who live in peace and draw upon our many cultures to make up the whole. We are not a Bristish, Chinese, Japanese, Mexican, African, French, Russian, Jewish Nation. We don't speak different dialects of various languages. We are all 'Americans' and we speak English. We obey American laws and fight for American families. Because of this fact, those who come here must ascimilate or they run counter to our culture and our laws.

It is not immigration that is America's problem. Immigration is what we are all about. It is illegal immigrants who do not wish to ascimilate, learn our language and obey our laws that put a drain on our society. They rape our system and strangle our economy only to return to Mexico to bolster it's economy. These people are a threat to America and must be stopped. We must build a barrier, toughen imigration laws and 'ENFORCE THEM'. Forget penalizing the employers and conducting raids on bussinesses. They are not the problem, and the illegals are not the problem. If you want to dole out repricusions, focus on the real cause of the problem.... those we apointed to represent us in government. These power hungry fools are busy with political pandering and refuse to address the problem. Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, we must push for a reform of the process by which people gain legal citizenry. Remove incintives by Abolishing the laws that allow children of those in the US illegally to become instant citizens. Shorten the process of nationalization. People should not have to wait for years to become a citizen. It is cruel and it imposes undue hardship on those whom deserve to be Americans, that is, those who want to be a part of America not feed on it.

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow, if I were you, since you (I think) have the same philosophy that the only way America can go down is from within, as I do, I wouldn't be too concerned with these jokers.
Hmmm,...but let's just say, maybe your suspicions are correct and the latinos attack all the white people. Agh! Too bad all our troops are in Iraq.
And then Iran attacks us soon, right?
Keep up the scare tactics, you'll only be scaring yourself, because this crap doesn't scare me.
You seem to be Xenophobic.
A wall?
A wall.
You're nuts, dude. Yeah, right behind the Statue of Liberty and "give me your tired, your poor and your Irish only..."?
Who cares about these extremeists. There are probably more white supremecists than these crazy latinos, and they didn't tople the capitol dome.
Jeez, Lueez.
Mushroom Cloud man! That's your new nickname.
Hold on, ...yes, I agree that all citizens should be processed and naturalized legally, but you gotta remember that the only way America is goin down is from within, because we're too strong and smart to go down from without.
So using this logic, maybe you should worry a little more about your own party and your beloved totalitarian administration that's been a little 'shook up' recently. I can't keep up with all the scandals and indictments recently, and they make Clinton's descretions look like Mickey Mouse making out with Minnie.
Let me update your readers,
Um...
Tom "the hammer" Delay resigned last week, Scott McClellan this week and ....GASP....your genius propagandistic weisel smear boy, Karl Rove resigned!
See, cause Karl is smart because he knows he's guilty for outing a covert CIA agent and being the president's goffer boy, so little piggy Karl RESIGNED.
Atta boy, Karl, keep the scandals comin'. Woo Hoo!

4/20/2006  
Blogger Unknown said...

Ok David you say I shouldn't be concerned about these 'Jokers'. Does that mean we should not be concerned with any threat to our people? On 911 a few men killed thousands of our people....innocent civilians! They did not take up guns and stand toe to toe with our military, they targeted civilians. The KKK is not big enough to take us down, yet they pose a threat to our civilian population. The ACLU is not large enough to defeat our finest American soldiers, yet they work to weaken our laws and reduce freedoms we as American civilians depend on.

Aztlan, MEChA and their ilk pose the same kind of threat. Will they take back the American southwest? NO! Is it likely that their hatred for America and their self-righteous agenda will cause them to begin committing terrorist attacks on our civilian population? You better believe it! The systemic tactics they use to weaken us are well documented. Our Schools, our Hospitals, our correctional institutions, our economic structure and our very culture is under constant attack by those who do not want to be Americans but to feed off of us and bolster their own economy. When socialism and dictatorships have failed in Mexico and other places, they try to supplement their shortfall and support a failing government by raping and stealing from Democracies that have succeeded. It's not scare tactics when there 'IS' a real threat.

Your assertion that La Reconquista is not a threat and if they were we couldn't protect ourselves because, " maybe your suspicions are correct and the Latinos attack all the white people. Agh! Too bad all our troops are in Iraq." That my dear misguided friend is scaretactics. Because you used an extreme exaggeration and warped opinion to further a notion that our liberation and protection of Iraq is causing us to be at a greater risk. You my dear Lib need to take on a nickname like, say, 'Mr. Pot' who calls the kettle black. America is secure with
one and a half MILLION active duty personnel. We have half a MILLION reserves. We currently deploy only 325,000 (less than half) around the world. We have only 169,200 soldiers in Iraq and about 20,000 in Afghanistan. So that would mean that we have less than half of our military spread out across the world and only half of those are in Iraq and Afghanistan. Don't come here and try to sell this Liberal propaganda. I am no 'Sammy Sausage Head', I deal in facts.
Delay resigned because he was falsely accused of committing a crime before it was considered a crime and at a time when more of that kind of electioneering was being done by Liberal Democrats.
I am glad that gives you comfort. However, I think you guys have made a great mistake. Tom will be much more powerful now. He is like Ob wan Kenobi, worth more to us and our cause than when he was in office.
And let's deal with your other inaccuracies. Karl Rove did not resign, (you really should work on the comprehension thing) he simply relinquished his duties dealing with domestic policy. He is still the Chief advisor. So that must make you wish you hadn't said, "GASP....your genius propagandistic weisel smear boy, Karl Rove resigned!See, cause Karl is smart because he knows he's guilty for outing a covert CIA agent and being the president's goffer boy, so little piggy Karl RESIGNED.Atta boy, Karl, keep the scandals comin'. Woo Hoo!" Got alittle excited there didn't ya. Sorry to point out yet another lie that you have been sold. But, hey, you keep buying it.

All in all, you said that we should worry less about people who hate us and threaten us, we should worry that all of our troops are tied up dying for a cause that is not worth it. ( that is, freeing 50 million people and providing freedom for them while turning an enemy into an ally) You say we should instead concentrate on partisan politics and how much we should hate those who we might not agree with. Hmm. That's interesting. I think you need another glass of Cool-aid that one seems to be a little bitter.

4/21/2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A few thoughts & questions...
"The ACLU is not large enough to defeat our finest American soldiers,..."
The ACLU is not waging war against us. What the heck are you talking about?
Ooooooh, you mean the social programs that were put in place by FDR and the New Deal...no, no I think they're on OUR side, so even thinking about "ACLU vs. the US ARMY!" is absurd.
Exactly how has the ACLU weakened our laws? Only the legislative branch of the government can do that, last time I checked.
"Aztlan, MEChA and their ilk pose the same kind of threat. Will they take back the American southwest? NO!"
Okay, stop right there. Don't you mean "Will they TAKE the American southwest" as opposed to "take BACK". Are you admitting that they owned it in the first place? Oopsy.
So you answered your own question by answering NO.
So what the heck are we arguing about? You just agreed with my assertion that they in fact, are a bunch of annoying little 'jokers'.
And then you say that they will start to act out terrorist attacks? Oh, well, with the bang up job homeland security has done so far, why worry?
By the way, socialism and dictatorships are completely different governing systems.
"America is secure with one and a half MILLION active duty personnel."
So if America is so secure, WHY WORRY ABOUT LA RECONQUISTA? Should we worry about the French Canadians too?
I set the bait out on that one, and you bit.
"Mr. Pot" eh? That is slightly amusing, though, for another completely different stereo-typical
political reason.
"We have only 169,200 soldiers in Iraq and about 20,000 in Afghanistan."
Shouldn't it be the other way around?
I'm glad you deal in facts, now, that's a step up for you. Good job.
"DeLay resigned because he was falsely accused of committing a crime before it was considered a crime and at a time when more of that kind of electioneering was being done by Liberal Democrats."
Hmmm...that still doesn't explain why NO dems were indicted.
On the contrary, my dear misguided friend, there was only ONE redistricting law in Texas, and Hot Tub Tom BROKE IT.
You should have been a lawyer, dude, you're really good at this bulls---ing.
Mr. Rove's long political career came to a shameful end when his attorney was forced to admit that in 2003 the White House political advisor didn't even know the name of the wife of former ambassador Joe Wilson, nor what she did in her job at the CIA.
So is this INCOMPETENCE, LYING, or JUST STUPIDITY?
"I have asked my dear friend Karl Rove to step down, for the good of the nation," said President Bush in a brief statement to reporters. "Karl will be tough to replace. As most of you know, he's the one who makes me look smart, even though I'm of average intelligence, with college grades no better than Sen. John Kerry's."
Nice try, though.
What exactly have I 'bought' recently that didn't come directly from your beloved presidents own lips?
Vioence continues to erupt, almost a full two years after Bush landed on that carrier and told us that "major combat in Iraq has ended"...
Hmmm...more soldiers and innocent civilians have DIED after Bush said this than before.
Free? People in Iraq are FREE? Come on, give me a break.
Now who's buying the lies.
Ken, anytime we attempt to have a discussion, it's going to be 'partisan' politics.
There's Team Ken(Opinion) and Team David (Facts).
And I don't hate people that I don't agree with. My best friend agrees more with you guys, and we're still best friends.
And Cool-Aid is spelled with a K.
What is this proverbial Kool-Aid you and your friends keep talking about? You seem much more aware of it than I do. I just look for truth, not partisanship.
By the way, I think Kool-Aid is just sugar and water, isn't it?

4/25/2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

And, since I know you might want to nail me on this one,...
yes, I know 'vioence' is spelled with an l. Oops.

4/25/2006  
Blogger Unknown said...

David, I am moving on from this crap. I am not going to keep dealing with these tired old topics. Not the topic that I spoke of in the post. The topics you have swerved us into. I do not write about 'BS' politics! I hate it. I discuss the issues that I feel effect me and that interest me.

But for now, let's deal with some of what you said.
The ACLU is anti American and Anti Christian. This nation is a Christian majority, the ACLU has brought cases before a then Liberal majority Supreme Court and together they have taken our freedoms and given them to an inept and corrupt federal government. Your little snide comments are cute though.

As for your dismissal of my comments about Aztlan etc; I said they were not a threat to us in that they would be successful in their agenda, however seeing that they have such an affection for the Palestinians, I could only imagine what they could resort to. The little attack on Homeland Security wasn't cute and reeks of unwarranted spite and hatred. I suppose the DHS should just disband because their is no need for them. According to you we have nothing to fear except our own ineptitude. Yet you Libs complain about how they haven't done their jobs. If your job is security, and there is no threat, how can you do poorly at your job? You are smart enough to follow this Dave, I know you are.

Mexico was ruled by Dictators for centuries before they adopted their current Socialist/Marxist government. Quit trying so hard to be cute. It's not working.
you set me up? I think you should look again. I believe I never came close to the trap you set. I have ALWAYS said America is the strongest most effective military on Earth. I clearly stated that the true danger of these anti American factions that you seem to be defending, is terrorist attacks. These are attacks that are not exactly 100% preventable. There have been 4792 terrorist attacks around the world since 911. To believe we are not at risk from factions who glorify and condone terrorism is by definition ignorant. Please think before you chose sides. Whenever you have enemies of America on one side and America on the other, jump on over to our side every time ok? If you don't, you'll wake up one day and be......as are they.....an enemy of the USA.

I have always dealt in FACTS Dave! You have been unsuccessful in your every attempt to correct me. How about you continue to check my facts, but how about if you give up on the imaginative rebuttal and think critically about what you think and how you feel about things. Give us your solutions, don't waste the time and space being petty. I write to further and express my point of view. If you disagree with the point of view, offer an alternative. Otherwise the conversations become tedious and boring. There are a million places like that around the net. I don't want to be like them. I want to deal in the expression of truth and ideas.
The quote you pasted is from a leftwing kook column July 12th of 2005. Unless I have been asleep for a year, I think Rove is still President Bush's Chief Political Advisor and he only relinquished certain non political duties. But you seem to be the one armed with all the latest news.
I have only seen the aircraft carrier thing 700 times, so thanks for dredging up an oldie but already dead talking point. The mission (not the war) which was to oust Saddam (which we did) was complete. Let it go man. Let it go.

You go on to make comments that foster the assumption that the Iraqi people have no hope, no future, and were better off with Saddam in power. If that is how you feel, I am disappointed in you.

I will explain to you about Kool-Aid another time. (Sorry for the misspelling, you got me there, whew, I guess I need to step down, I am too corrupt. I mean, David would never misspell anything)

4/26/2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No! No, no, no. I will not let you weasel your way out of this.
I’m glad you’re moving on, as I probably should, but some times I can’t ignore the lies you tell.
I’d really like to think that you’re just misinformed, but I know you’re smarter than that.
According to you, the ACLU is ant-Christian, right?
NOT TRUE.
The Christian Right always attacks the ACLU (probably for advocating those pesky social programs that you righties despise) claiming that they are a “godless” organization attempting to banish God from public arenas.
So how do you explain away the fact that the ACLU in 2001, successfully fought for a students right to use a bible verse in their school yearbook? Look it up if you would like – http://atheism.about.com/b/a/086453.htm. That’s just one example.
I know this might greatly pain or frustrate you, but let’s stay focused, shall we?
I know you think that I go off topic, but you are the one who mentioned the ACLU attacking us.
I’m slightly amused that you make the assertion that in your opening paragraph that you are “moving on from this crap” and that you are “not going to keep dealing with these tired old topics. Not the topic that I spoke of in the post. The topics you have swerved us into. I do not write about ‘BS’ politics! I hate it. I discuss the issues that I feel effect me and that interest me.”
I know, being corrected is not in your best interest. Ah, that’s my typical fundamentalist neo-con. And immediately after this display of temporary self righteous ‘enlightenment’, you go right on to say
“But for now, let’s deal with some of what you said…”
That was a big joke, right? Do you study satire?
So I guess next time you say that I’m being ‘cute’ I’ll take it as a compliment.
“As for your dismissal of my comments about Aztlan etc; I said they were not a threat to us in that they would never be successful in their agenda, however seeing that they have such an affection for the Palestinians, I could only imagine what they could resort to.”
Soooo, if there was a short stumpy little jibberish speaking bully on the play ground that always threatened you and your over sized buddies for something you didn’t do, wouldn’t you just ignore their dumb ass, unless they posed a clear and present danger?
We should always remind ourselves that we are the DEFENDERS of freedom, not OFFENDERS of diplomacy.
If you were simply trying to raise awareness of the uprisings, then that’s great, I agree you should report what you know.
But then you go on to say total hogwash like
“I clearly stated that the true danger of these anti-American factions that you seem to be defending is terrorist attacks.”
Yeah, that’s it, I’m defending terrorist attacks. Now you’re hitting below the belt. Stop it. Play by the rules…oh wait,…you’re a republican, nevermind, you don’t know how to do that. You guys can’t even NOT lie about what kind of weekend you’re going to have.
At least Billy O’Reilly or Hellspawn Hannity or Flush Limbaugh would have skipped the passive-aggressive approach to their unfounded bait and switch rhetoric and called me an out and out terrorist because I disagree with the majority of their ideas.
I like how you gently nudge at the notion that I’m a terrorist sympathizer because I don’t buy your argument.
“Oh…liberal? Must be an anti American, terrorist sympathizer.
“…that you seem to be defending…”???
How am I defending them Ken? I’m sorry, but calling them ‘jokers’ does not constitute defending or sympathizing with them.
The right always smears those that don’t agree with everything they say, like calling Russ Feingold a terrorist sympathizer when he motioned to censure the president.
That’s just annoying Ken. Grow up.
Excuse me, but I live here in America too. You are resorting to talking points and punditry, not me.
“There have been 4792 terrorist attacks around the world since 911.”
Oh, really? And how many of those were because we invaded Iraq? Wouldn’t you count all the insurgent’s attacks ‘terrorist’ attacks? Or do those cancel out because technically they’re casualties of war? Go ahead, spin it any way you want, buddy.
“To believe we are not at risk from factions who glorify and condone terrorism is by definition, ignorant. Please think before you choose sides. Whenever you have enemies of America on one side on one side and America on the other, jump on over to our side every time, okay? If you don’t, you’ll wake up one day and be…as are they…an enemy of the USA.”
It’s that Bushian ultimatum once again, “if you’re not with us, you’re against us.”
Things aren’t that simple, Ken. The FACT (which I can back up) that this entire administration is corrupt, and all they care about is money for their corporate cronies, profit before people, pollution before health care tells me that they are enemies of America, and they must be stopped in any legal way possible.
Yes there are exterior threats, but the American people will always find away to set aside their differences for the greater good when attacked from outside.
Remember how Rome fell? You like the History Channel, don’t you? Hasn’t it taught you anything yet?
I’m telling you that the only way to make our selves weak enough for the terrorists to win is from within. This corruption has got to stop. And it will, starting with this years mid term elections. I’m so sick and tired of setting you straight.
All this bulls--- about “oh, come on, buddy, he’s our president. How could you possibly attack our president when we’re in the middle of a war? Come on, show a little more patriotism and be on Americas side.”
Listen, if I, or any other liberal, moderate or now republican didn’t speak up about the vast corruption and unmitigated recklessness of this disaster of an administration, THAT would be anti-American, by censoring or trying to shut me up and move on to your next talking point, you come across as a fascist which is very disheartening because I know you’re a loyal American who wants his children to grow in a healthy and safe America.
By claiming that I’m a terrorist sympathizer or that I’m not on “our side” you are stifling the debate with rhetoric and ‘BS’. STOP IT. I’m going to pull my f---ing hair out if you suggest that I sympathize with sociopathic assholes that take innocent life one more f---ing time.
“The quote you pasted is from a leftwing kook column….”
Good job, MacGuyver. The reason I did is because it’s a quote from Dubya, and if Dubya said it, it has to be true, right? Come on, who are you to deny your president?
Also- I just love it when I use in reference things that our president has said to us and then claim that they’re out of date. Like the aircraft carrier thing? How convenient.
If it’s about the war that our soldiers are FIGHTING and DYING in, I’d say his quotes are pretty f---ing relevant, wouldn’t you?
I’m not saying that the Iraqi people have no hope or future, but come on, you have got to stop lying to yourself into thinking that this invasion and occupation of Iraq has been anything but successful. I’d give you the stats, but you might think it’s old news. It’s a hell of a lot easier to cloak yourself in warm fuzzy feelings about the disaster over there but it is not a cure for the cancer. Stop acting like this president is impervious to criticism. He’s an abomination and an embarrassment to this country’s integrity.

4/28/2006  

Post a Comment

<< Home

LIVE AMBER ALERTS