The Squamata Report: Who's the Authority? God or Man?

Sunday, October 07, 2007

Who's the Authority? God or Man?


~Repost from 2006~
Answers in Genesis
Many Christian people think that the Earth was created millions or billions of years ago. They think this because they have been indoctrinated by a secularist school system that openly discriminates against the teachings of the Bible. This is just one of the many beliefs Christian Americans have that are inherently opposed to the truth in the Bible. In this column I am going to explore some of the things that Christians believe as a result of indoctrination by an anti-Christian/secularist portion of society as illustrated in Ken Ham's teachings.


When was the Earth formed?


According to God's word it was created a little more than 6 thousand years ago. In Mark Chapter ten verse six Jesus said. "But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female."
He was referring to the fact, plainly stated in Genesis, that Adam and Eve were created on the sixth day of creation. Now if the Earth was created and then five days later God made man, then this verse makes sense.
But if man came along millions of years later, Christ's words were incorrect and misleading. I'll let you decide who to believe, Christ or Scientists.

If you believe that God is the authority and not man, you have to believe that the genealogies recorded in the Bible are true and complete. Scientists say that the Earth is millions or billions of years old. They can't fit the millions of years in after Adam because the Hebrew scholars have proven the genealogy between Adam and Abraham to be true and complete. So scientists say that dinosaurs existed millions of years before Adam. By this they are saying that death and disease was found on the Earth millions of years before Adam sinned. Yet we know that death and disease came as a result of man sinning. If you believe that fossils studied by scentists date back millions of years, you must also say that there was death and suffering on Earth before Adam sinned. That simply can't be. That is if you believe that God is the authority and not man.

Dinosaurs, did they live with man?


The Bible tells us that all land animals were created on the sixth day. That means that dinosaurs were made along side Adam and Eve. Because of the sin of man, God sent a flood to destroy the inhabitants of the Earth. The dinosaurs and all other land creatures were kept safe in Noah's Arc. That means that they came off the ark and lived among other animals and man. Now, some dinosaurs didn't go on the arch and many were drowned. That's why we find fossils of them. We have many records around the world by people who claim to have lived among these creatures. Many countries have history books that are filled with images of huge dragon like creatures that fit the dinosaur description well. Some became extinct and some are still living on Earth today.
There have been dinosaur bones found with soft tissue in them, even containing blood vessels, viable cells and fluid. Dinosaurs did not die out millions of years ago, to believe so, you would have to truly be blinded by men who place themselves as the authority over God!



Atonement or Evolution
















You may ask, what does atonement of sins and evolution have to do with one another? actually....a great deal.Let me explain.
When Adam and Eve sinned, God killed an animal and clothed them. This was symbolic of what was to come in Jesus Christ's atonement on the cross. It was the first blood sacrifice. After that their son Able often made blood offerings to God. The Israelites sacrificed sheep for years until the ultimate and final blood sacrifice... Christ's. If death came before sin, then death and bloodshed have nothing to do with sin then Christ's sacrifice was in vain. For Christians to believe as evolutionists do, that there were millions of years worth of death and disease before sin, they cannot view any atonement, even Christ's, as meaningful. The very foundation of the gospel, which is why Jesus died on the cross (for our sins), is dependant on the fact that death only came as a result of sin. To believe otherwise is to make man...not God the authority.

A twisted God

According to men like Carl Sagan, even if God did exist he could not be a loving God because of all the death and violence, man's inhumanity to man and so on. According to their beliefs the Earth was rife with carnage and death from the beginning. This belief undermines scripture that says that sin is the cause of death, that God made a perfect world and we messed it up. The Earth is on a downward track not upward. God did not make our world full of pain and disease. He made it perfect and our sin brought about the decay. Regardless, these scientists claim pain, sickness and disease is due to a deviant God or no God at all. You see if man does good in spite ofa twisted God, he is the authority not God.


Did we all come from Eve?


Many opponents to Biblical authority contest that man could not have come from one man and one woman. This despite a recent scientific acceptance of Eve as the first mother. Through Mitochondrial (female only) DNA, scientists have determined that not only did we all come from one woman, but due to recent calculations of the rate of mutation in humans, which is said to be 20x the original rate used to calculate hundreds of thousands of years, the first mother had to have lived about six thousand years ago. Supporting Genesis. Secularist scientists refuse to believe in this because of their bias against God, but even they cannot discredit or disprove the findings! This shows that the Bible's foundation is certifiable and we did all come from one woman.


How did Cain find a wife?

















This issue was dealt with in the 1925 'Scopes trial'. It was an effort by the ACLU to disprove an existence of God. A man named William J Bryan was put on the witness stand and forced to show that the Bible was factual.
Now, Bryan was not prepared to debate these mega-lawyers such as the famed Clarence Darrow. So when asked about Cain's wife, he stumbled and could not answer. But there 'is' an answer, it is found in Genesis 5:4. It explains how Adam and Eve had sons and daughters. Then Leviticus 18-20 tells us that the law against close relatives marrying did not come about until the time of Moses. Many Christians are uncomfortable with this fact and think it means man would be genetically unclean or defiled in some way. If incest happens today we see the genetic consequences because of the mutation history of human genes. These genetic consequences did not exist six thousand years ago when our genetic thread was young. You can accept the theory championed by the sham that was the Scopes trial (
read this for proof that it was a sham) and count man as the authority or you can believe that God is the Authority and prove it with real Answers in Genesis.

Here is a sample of Ken Ham's sermons.

Right click and choose save as to download Ken Ham sermon

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

hey ken. would you mind answering a few questions for me? im curious about how someone might believe that the earth is only 6 thousand years old, and if you do indeed beleive it?
why do you think the universe is so big, with so many stars and planets, etc? are all others planets barren of life? if not, are the beings there also only 6 thousand years old, and have one option to avoid hell upon death- accepting the human jesus as their savior? if there are not any ohter plantes with life on them, why did god make so much extra stuff?
why do you think god would have created the world in one day 6 thousand years ago, and then leave immeasurable evidence to the contrary? i mean, you cannot find a credible geologist, biologist, archealogist, paleantologist, etc who thinks the earth in only 6 thousand years old.
why do fossils date chemically to way before then? why do canyon walls exibit distict layers of earth that could only have been created by 10s of thousands or 100s of thousands of years each?
my personal opinion, and that of those who actually study this stuff (outside of the bibble) is that they are indeed older than 6 thousand years.
let me pose this seroius question to you: why is it so damn offensive to you that the earth might be older that 6 thousand years? why is it so offensive that we have ties to the earth and to other species that insinuate we are closely realted to certian other species?
i find this idea conforting. i find the notion that our earth is very old, and that humanity is a developing part of the total earth biology a noble one. i feel that it is a meaningful and spiritual notion that our planet and our selves have a much deeper, richer, more dramatic history than being popped into existance in a day.
if fact, i find in belittleing to deny this "notion," which is really more fact than conjecture (ask anyone who reads and studies things outside of the bible and bible-inspired writings).
i believ in god ken. but to short-change the magnificance of the universe, our planet, and ourselves by touting the mid-evil belief of creationism is insulting to humanity and to god.
god may or may not exist. if he does, we have not even begun to understand what he did or does. don't be-little. he is not a magician with a rabbit and a top hat with a hidden compartment.

yours,
cole

1/09/2008  
Blogger Squamata22 said...

Good to see you're still out there Cole.
I really wish I could sit down over a coffee and go over some of these things. First of all if you will give Ken Ham's speech a listen, it is possible you will find how much sense it makes. Understand the difference between Isogesis and exegesis. Understand that when you view the Bible one way and I view it another way we may just have to agree to disagree.

You see I believe that to say that Nefesh life was snuffed out, animals were eating other animals, cancer and thorns were evident and even total extinction of species occurred prior to Adam's sin is to say that Christ's sacrifice for us was foolishness! If Death existed before sin, why would Christ die for those sins to overcome death? Why are the days of creation, genesis 1 through 11, placed in the context of morning evening and night? Why are they numbered first day first night etc? If you can't see that the Bible is putting into context the word day, you are not reading carefully enough.
I understand you chose to believe man's fallible nature to educate you on our history and that is your right. God bless you for believing something atleast.
But I will continue to believe science that supports the Bible. It must first be rooted in Biblical context.
I don't have time here, but I could point by point refute your claims. However, instead of my rambling on and on, why don't you, please go to iTunes and sign up for free to 'Around the World with AIG's Ken Ham'. it is a short daily podcast. Also search for "Ken Ham". There you will find half a dozen speeches. Listen to one or all of them and then let me know what you think.
Hint: One of them is available on my site. Or go to http://squamatareport.blip.tv/

1/09/2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

ken, i must repond. the disagreement is simple.
any "scientist" who claims the bible is literally true, is not a true objective scientist, but rather an advocate for the bible in scientists' clothing.
god gave us many abilities. one is to be irrational. another is to use rationality. to use rationality one must look at "the bigger picture;" one must look at as many sides to the story as possible, and then pass judgement.
there is a reason that all across the world, school text books say, for example and don't quote me, "the sierra nevada was pushed up by colliding tectonic plates 50million years ago." there is a reason why we run across phrases such as "person X who ruled egypt from BC 7000 to BC 6500..." all the time. the reason is because extensive and proffesional study has been conducted on a myraid of these subjects, and rational society deems it knowlege worthy to impart to our young. and look- religious fundamentalists are the ones who say "no no, that can't be true because my holy book "says" its not. true scientists do not. they may disagree on the years these things happened, but people who look at hisotry and geology do not say, "no, it all happened 6000 years ago or less, or it didn't happen at all."
have you considered that the bible was written before pens and paper existed? before telescopes and microscopes were even dreamt of?
there are many small tribes who not effected by globalism that believe in their own, very irrational creation myths. the people who wrote the numerous works that eventually coaleced into the bible lived in very similair situations. your apparent believe was created by primitive tribesmen. they were- what men do you think first recorded the words you read from the bible?
they did not have the tools that provide us with the information we have today. sorry, but those people were primitive, as we will be a thousand years from now.
a rational person will not say, "i beleive what i believe because my favorite book, and the writings meant to support that book, say whats so is so and period, end of story."
why not give gods complex works a chance, give it the credit it deserves and admit there is a little more to the story, namely dynamic biology, physics, and geology that date back millions and billions of years?

cole

1/09/2008  

Post a Comment

<< Home

LIVE AMBER ALERTS